Alleged Brutality: Cross Examine now or get ready for defence, Abuja panel tells police

0

By SINL Staff

The Independent Investigative Panel on human rights violations of the disbanded Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) and other police units, sitting in Abuja, on Monday frowned at the police, saying it should “either cross-examine petitioner or forego that right and get ready for  defence”.

Dr Garba Tetengi SAN, who stood in for the Chairman gave this directive, when Counsel to the Police respondents, Malik Taiwo stated that the counsel assigned to the petition on alleged violation of rights to life, human dignity and personal liberty, was unavoidably absent, stressing that he (Taiwo) was not familiar with the petition and could not cross-examine the petitioner.

Tetengi however rejected The excuse by the police and countered that the panel views the police  institution as one entity and ordered them to stop bulk passing in the presence of the panel.

It would be recalled at the first hearing on 15th February 2021, Stephen Udeogu narrated to the panel how SARS  operatives lay siege at his family house, saying he was shot at his waist. 

His brother, Lawrence Udeogu  who was later taken away by men of SARS, allegedly died in their custody following torture that was meted out on him.

The petitioner, Stephen Udeogu who appeared before the panel for cross examination by the police on alleged gross violation of his fundamental rights by SARS operatives  stated that so far  he has  spent 48,000,000 in  surgery and other hospital expenses, explaining that though some of the monies came from donations, adding that stakeholders he still needs money for major surgery abroad

See also  Nigerian Air Force graduates 1,549 recruits, 49 officers

He lamented that he suffered excruciating pain as he carries metal in his body.

The case was adjourned to 14th April 2021 for defence.

In a related development, the petition of one Anthony Obioha could not be heard due to the absence of  the petitioner and his Counsel Anthony Chukwurah for the second time.

On enquiry via phone call, the Counsel apologised for wasting the time of the panel and  stated that the petitioner is indisposed due to chronic eye problem.

The matter has been adjourned pending the recovery of the petitioner.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here