State Constituencies Delimitation: Rivers Rep accuses INEC of duty abdication


By SamuelVincent

Member representing Degema/Bonny Federal Constituency, Hon. Farah Dagogo, has accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of failing to implement state constituencies delimitation duties as required by the law.

Farah Dagogo made the accusation on Tuesday in reaction to comments credited to INEC’s Lagos State Resident Electoral Commissioner, Sam Olumekun, wherein he said the delimitation of constituencies was long overdue in accordance with the 1999 Constitution.

Mr. Olumekun while speaking at a week-long retreat on the review of the electoral legal framework jointly organised by the Commission, the European Centre for Electoral Support (ECES) and the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) said the last constituency delimitation was done “more than a long time ago, “adding that the population of the country and registered voters have increased exponentially, thereby underscoring an urgent review for proportional and fair representation. 

Farah Dagogo however noted that the nonchalant attitude of INEC to carry out its functions as required by the  Constitution necessitated his motion entitled:  Call on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to Comply with Constitution Provisions on State Constituencies in the Federation”, presented on the floor of the House on February 6, 2020.

The lawmaker expressed displeasure that his motion was stood down on the grounds of technicalities bothering on semantics.

He, however, believes the position of the Constitution on that matter is explicit and devoid of any ambiguity.

“Section 112 empowers the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to divide every state in the Federation into such number of State Constituencies within that State.

See also  Plateau: Tinubu condemns attacks, directs immediate arrest of culprits 

“INEC is also empowered by Section 114 (1) of the Constitution to review the division of every State into Constituencies at intervals of not less than ten years.

“Also, Section 91 of the Constitution explains how a state is qualified for state constituencies where ” House of Assembly of a State shall consist of three or four times the number of seats which that state has in the House of Representatives… provided that a House of Assembly of a state shall consist of not less than twenty-four and not more than forty members’,

“It was in the light of the foregoing and especially in the spirit of Section 91 of the Constitution  and also because I believe that where a law spells injustice, its injurious effect shall be curtailed by the National Assembly being the institution saddled with that responsibility that I prayed the House to direct INEC to ensure compliance with the Constitution.

Dagogo said Rivers state need additional seven state constituencies to balance and compensate the shortfalls created by the non-implementation of constituency delimitation by INEC.

“Rivers State has 13 members in the House of Representatives and a 32 member state House of Assembly. By interpretation of the constitution,  Rivers State is qualified for additional seven State Constituencies, to increase its number to at least 39 state constituencies seats. 
“And it is not only Rivers State that was short changed, other states such as Plateau, Oyo, Sokoto, Borno, Anambra, Bauchi, Delta, Akwa Ibom and many more are adversely affected by INEC’s failure to discharge this obligation.

See also  Revealed: How Bauchi lost N774m pension fund to ghost pensioners

“While INEC is focusing on amendments of some sections of the electoral acts, they should also see to the enforcement of the Constitution where they have necessary powers. It is more than 20 years since the last delimitation was done. The Constitution is supreme to any other law and we should toe and follow it to the letters” he added.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here